The diagram above illustrates the ecosystem of creative tourism development. The model
highlights the interaction between local communities, creative industries, tourism businesses,
government policies, and tourists. These stakeholders collectively contribute to sustainable
tourism development by fostering innovation, cultural preservation, and economic growth within
tourism destinations.
4.
Conclusion
The transformation of tourism destinations in the era of the creative economy reflects
broader structural changes in the global tourism industry driven by globalization, technological
innovation, and evolving tourist preferences. The literature reviewed in this study indicates that
globalization has expanded tourism networks and intensified competition among destinations,
while digital technologies have reshaped tourism marketing, distribution systems, and visitor
engagement. At the same time, the traditional mass tourism model has gradually shifted toward
experience-based tourism, where tourists increasingly seek authentic, meaningful, and
participatory experiences. This transformation requires tourism destinations to move beyond
standardized tourism products and focus on creating immersive experiences that integrate local
culture, community participation, and emotional engagement.
Furthermore, the creative economy has emerged as a key strategic driver for enhancing
destination competitiveness and sustainability. By integrating creative industries such as arts,
culture, culinary traditions, and local craftsmanship into tourism development, destinations can
create distinctive tourism products and strengthen their branding in global markets. The literature
also highlights the importance of collaborative governance involving governments, local
communities, tourism businesses, and creative industry actors in developing creative tourism
ecosystems. Overall, the transformation of tourism destinations in the creative economy era
requires innovative policy frameworks, strong stakeholder collaboration, and sustainable
management strategies to ensure that tourism development generates economic value while
preserving cultural authenticity and environmental sustainability.
5. References
Aamir, S., & Atsan, N. (2020). The trend of multisided platforms (MSPs) in the travel industry:
Reintermediation of travel agencies (TAs) and global distribution systems (GDSs). Journal
of Tourism Futures, 6(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-10-2019-0121
Aji, H. K., Murdani, A. D., & Wijayati, H. (2023). The Strategy in Developing Global
Competitive Tourism Based on Creative Economy and Local Wisdom (Case Study: Solo
City, Indonesia). International Journal of Business and Applied Economics, 2(5), 851–
862. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijbae.v2i5.5970
Alfifto, A., Rini, E. S., & Absah, Y. (2020). Experiential Tourism in Lake Toba Samosir District.
Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 11(6), 1385.
https://doi.org/10.14505/jemt.v11.6(46).08
Bode, O. R. (2018). Dynamics of International Tourism at Global Level. Studia Universitatis
Babeș-Bolyai Negotia, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbnegotia.2018.1.04
Chiu, Y., Zhang, W., & Ding, K. (2020). Does Globalization Influence Inbound Tourism?
Evidence From a Dynamic Panel Threshold Analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 60(5),
1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520919514
Conceição de Maria Belfort de Carvalho, Cutrim, K. D. G., Bandeira, A. M., Oliveira, A. C. A.,
Carvalho, K. D., & Santos, D. S. (2020). The Concept of Experience Applied to Tourist
Products Commercialized in São Luis (Maranhão, Brazil). International Journal for
Innovation Education and Research, 8(10), 237–249.
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss10.2675